on 8/3/2023 10:41 PM, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Here are prepared work:
>> 1. Include mballoc-test.c to mballoc.c to be able test static function
>> in mballoc.c.
>> 2. Implement static stub to avoid read IO to disk.
>> 3. Construct fake super_block. Only partial members are set, more members
>> will be set when more functions are tested.
>> Then unit test for ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple is added.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c | 323 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 4 +
>> 2 files changed, 327 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..184e6cb2070f
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,323 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * KUnit test of ext4 multiblocks allocation.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <kunit/test.h>
>> +#include <kunit/static_stub.h>
>> +
>> +#include "ext4.h"
>> +
>> +struct mb_grp_ctx {
>> + struct buffer_head bitmap_bh;
>> + struct ext4_group_desc desc;
>> + /* one group descriptor for each group descriptor for simplicity */
>> + struct buffer_head gd_bh;
>> +};
>
> I suppose desc and gd_bh are just the place holders so that
> ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple() doesn't fail right? Is there any other use
> of this? Because I don't see we initializing these.
>
>> +
>> +struct mb_ctx {
>> + struct mb_grp_ctx *grp_ctx;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct fake_super_block {
>> + struct super_block sb;
>> + struct mb_ctx mb_ctx;
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define MB_CTX(_sb) (&(container_of((_sb), struct fake_super_block, sb)->mb_ctx))
>> +#define MB_GRP_CTX(_sb, _group) (&MB_CTX(_sb)->grp_ctx[_group])
>> +
>> +static struct super_block *alloc_fake_super_block(void)
>> +{
>> + struct ext4_super_block *es = kzalloc(sizeof(*es), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = kzalloc(sizeof(*sbi), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + struct fake_super_block *fsb = kzalloc(sizeof(*fsb), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +
>> + if (fsb == NULL || sbi == NULL || es == NULL)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + sbi->s_es = es;
>> + fsb->sb.s_fs_info = sbi;
>> + return &fsb->sb;
>> +
>> +out:
>> + kfree(fsb);
>> + kfree(sbi);
>> + kfree(es);
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void free_fake_super_block(struct super_block *sb)
>> +{
>> + struct fake_super_block *fsb = container_of(sb, struct fake_super_block, sb);
>> + struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
>> +
>> + kfree(sbi->s_es);
>> + kfree(sbi);
>> + kfree(fsb);
>> +}
>> +
>> +struct ext4_block_layout {
>> + unsigned char blocksize_bits;
>> + unsigned int cluster_bits;
>> + unsigned long blocks_per_group;
>> + ext4_group_t group_count;
>> + unsigned long desc_size;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void init_sb_layout(struct super_block *sb,
>> + struct ext4_block_layout *layout)
>> +{
>> + struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
>> + struct ext4_super_block *es = sbi->s_es;
>> +
>> + sb->s_blocksize = 1UL << layout->blocksize_bits;
>> + sb->s_blocksize_bits = layout->blocksize_bits;
>> +
>> + sbi->s_groups_count = layout->group_count;
>> + sbi->s_blocks_per_group = layout->blocks_per_group;
>> + sbi->s_cluster_bits = layout->cluster_bits;
>> + sbi->s_cluster_ratio = 1U << layout->cluster_bits;
>> + sbi->s_clusters_per_group = layout->blocks_per_group >>
>> + layout->cluster_bits;
>> + sbi->s_desc_size = layout->desc_size;
>> +
>> + es->s_first_data_block = cpu_to_le32(0);
>> + es->s_blocks_count_lo = cpu_to_le32(layout->blocks_per_group *
>> + layout->group_count);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int mb_grp_ctx_init(struct super_block *sb,
>> + struct mb_grp_ctx *grp_ctx)
>> +{
>> + grp_ctx->bitmap_bh.b_data = kzalloc(EXT4_BLOCK_SIZE(sb), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (grp_ctx->bitmap_bh.b_data == NULL)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + get_bh(&grp_ctx->bitmap_bh);
>> + get_bh(&grp_ctx->gd_bh);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void mb_grp_ctx_release(struct mb_grp_ctx *grp_ctx)
>> +{
>> + kfree(grp_ctx->bitmap_bh.b_data);
>> + grp_ctx->bitmap_bh.b_data = NULL;
>
> No brelse() here?
>>> +}
>> +
>> +static void mb_ctx_mark_used(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t group,
>> + unsigned int start, unsigned int len)
>> +{
>> + struct mb_grp_ctx *grp_ctx = MB_GRP_CTX(sb, group);
>> +
>> + mb_set_bits(grp_ctx->bitmap_bh.b_data, start, len);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* called after init_sb_layout */
>> +static int mb_ctx_init(struct super_block *sb)
>> +{
>> + struct mb_ctx *ctx = MB_CTX(sb);
>> + ext4_group_t i, ngroups = ext4_get_groups_count(sb);
>> +
>> + ctx->grp_ctx = kcalloc(ngroups, sizeof(struct mb_grp_ctx),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (ctx->grp_ctx == NULL)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < ngroups; i++)
>> + if (mb_grp_ctx_init(sb, &ctx->grp_ctx[i]))
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * first data block(first cluster in first group) is used by
>> + * metadata, mark it used to avoid to alloc data block at first
>> + * block which will fail ext4_sb_block_valid check.
>> + */
>> + mb_set_bits(ctx->grp_ctx[0].bitmap_bh.b_data, 0, 1);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +out:
>> + while (i-- > 0)
>> + mb_grp_ctx_release(&ctx->grp_ctx[i]);
>> + kfree(ctx->grp_ctx);
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void mb_ctx_release(struct super_block *sb)
>> +{
>> + struct mb_ctx *ctx = MB_CTX(sb);
>> + ext4_group_t i, ngroups = ext4_get_groups_count(sb);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < ngroups; i++)
>> + mb_grp_ctx_release(&ctx->grp_ctx[i]);
>> + kfree(ctx->grp_ctx);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct buffer_head *
>> +ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait_stub(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group,
>> + bool ignore_locked)
>> +{
>> + struct mb_grp_ctx *grp_ctx = MB_GRP_CTX(sb, block_group);
>> +
>> + get_bh(&grp_ctx->bitmap_bh);
>
> I don't know how will you call brelse() for this?
> It should be ok anyways since it's not a real buffer_head. But may be it
> will be good to add a comment about it.
>
Sure, but I'm considering to simply remove all get_bh for fake buffer_heador.
And comments will be added if these get_bhs are kept for some unkonw limitation.
>> + return &grp_ctx->bitmap_bh;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ext4_wait_block_bitmap_stub(struct super_block *sb,
>> + ext4_group_t block_group,
>> + struct buffer_head *bh)
>> +{
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct ext4_group_desc *
>> +ext4_get_group_desc_stub(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group,
>> + struct buffer_head **bh)
>> +{
>> + struct mb_grp_ctx *grp_ctx = MB_GRP_CTX(sb, block_group);
>> +
>> + if (bh != NULL)
>> + *bh = &grp_ctx->gd_bh;
>> +
>> + return &grp_ctx->desc;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ext4_mb_mark_group_bb_stub(struct ext4_mark_context *mc,
>> + ext4_group_t group, ext4_grpblk_t blkoff,
>> + ext4_grpblk_t len, int flags)
>> +{
>> + struct mb_grp_ctx *grp_ctx = MB_GRP_CTX(mc->sb, group);
>> + struct buffer_head *bitmap_bh = &grp_ctx->bitmap_bh;
>> +
>> + if (mc->state)
>> + mb_set_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, len);
>> + else
>> + mb_clear_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, len);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define TEST_BLOCKSIZE_BITS 10
>> +#define TEST_CLUSTER_BITS 3
>> +#define TEST_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP 8192
>> +#define TEST_GROUP_COUNT 4
>> +#define TEST_DESC_SIZE 64
>> +#define TEST_GOAL_GROUP 1
>
> Rather then defining this statically, can we add a test for testing
> different options. like for e.g. bs=1k, 4k, and 64k to be tested in a
> loop or something with maybe diffrent group_count values to start with?
>
Yes, it looks better in this way. I will add several configures to test.
> At a high level, I went over the code and this looks like a good
> first start to me. One suggestion is to prefix the mballoc kunit tests
> with some string to differentiate what is kunit related and what is
> actual ext4/mballoc calls. Once this kunit test grows, I am sure it will
> be difficult to make out the differece between test related APIs and
> actual kernel APIs.
>
> maybe something like mbt_
>
> so mb_grp_ctx -> mbt_grp_ctx
> mb_ctx -> mbt_ctx
> fake_super_block -> mbt_ext4_super_block
> alloc/free_fake_super_block -> mbt_ext4_alloc/free_super_block
>
> ext4_block_layout -> mbt_ext4_block_layout
>
> init_sb_layout -> mbt_init_sb_layout
>
> mb_grp_ctx_init/release -> mbt_grp_ctx_init/release
> mb_ctx_mark_used -> mbt_ctx_mark_used
>
> mballoc_test_init -> mbt_kunit_init
> ext4_mballoc_test_cases -> mbt_test_cases
>
Sure, prefix mbt just looks good to me.
> funtions with _stub looks ok to me, as we can clearly differentiate them
> from actual functions.
>
>
> -ritesh
>
Thanks for all advices!
>
>> +static int mballoc_test_init(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> + struct ext4_block_layout layout = {
>> + .blocksize_bits = TEST_BLOCKSIZE_BITS,
>> + .cluster_bits = TEST_CLUSTER_BITS,
>> + .blocks_per_group = TEST_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP,
>> + .group_count = TEST_GROUP_COUNT,
>> + .desc_size = TEST_DESC_SIZE,
>> + };
>> + struct super_block *sb;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + sb = alloc_fake_super_block();
>> + if (sb == NULL)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + init_sb_layout(sb, &layout);
>> +
>> + ret = mb_ctx_init(sb);
>> + if (ret != 0) {
>> + free_fake_super_block(sb);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + test->priv = sb;
>> + kunit_activate_static_stub(test,
>> + ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait,
>> + ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait_stub);
>> + kunit_activate_static_stub(test,
>> + ext4_wait_block_bitmap,
>> + ext4_wait_block_bitmap_stub);
>> + kunit_activate_static_stub(test,
>> + ext4_get_group_desc,
>> + ext4_get_group_desc_stub);
>> + kunit_activate_static_stub(test,
>> + ext4_mb_mark_group_bb,
>> + ext4_mb_mark_group_bb_stub);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void mballoc_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> + struct super_block *sb = (struct super_block *)test->priv;
>> +
>> + mb_ctx_release(sb);
>> + free_fake_super_block(sb);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void test_new_blocks_simple(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> + struct super_block *sb = (struct super_block *)test->priv;
>> + struct inode inode = { .i_sb = sb, };
>> + struct ext4_allocation_request ar;
>> + ext4_group_t i, goal_group = TEST_GOAL_GROUP;
>> + int err = 0;
>> + ext4_fsblk_t found;
>> + struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
>> +
>> + ar.inode = &inode;
>> +
>> + /* get block at goal */
>> + ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
>> + found = ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(&ar, &err);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, ar.goal, found,
>> + "failed to alloc block at goal, expected %llu found %llu",
>> + ar.goal, found);
>> +
>> + /* get block after goal in goal group */
>> + ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
>> + found = ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(&ar, &err);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, ar.goal + EXT4_C2B(sbi, 1), found,
>> + "failed to alloc block after goal in goal group, expected %llu found %llu",
>> + ar.goal + 1, found);
>> +
>> + /* get block after goal group */
>> + mb_ctx_mark_used(sb, goal_group, 0, EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb));
>> + ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
>> + found = ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(&ar, &err);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test,
>> + ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group + 1), found,
>> + "failed to alloc block after goal group, expected %llu found %llu",
>> + ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group + 1), found);
>> +
>> + /* get block before goal group */
>> + for (i = goal_group; i < ext4_get_groups_count(sb); i++)
>> + mb_ctx_mark_used(sb, i, 0, EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb));
>> + ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
>> + found = ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(&ar, &err);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test,
>> + ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, 0) + EXT4_C2B(sbi, 1), found,
>> + "failed to alloc block before goal group, expected %llu found %llu",
>> + ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, 0 + EXT4_C2B(sbi, 1)), found);
>> +
>> + /* no block available, fail to allocate block */
>> + for (i = 0; i < ext4_get_groups_count(sb); i++)
>> + mb_ctx_mark_used(sb, i, 0, EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb));
>> + ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
>> + found = ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(&ar, &err);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NE_MSG(test, err, 0,
>> + "unexpectedly get block when no block is available");
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>> +static struct kunit_case ext4_mballoc_test_cases[] = {
>> + KUNIT_CASE(test_new_blocks_simple),
>> + {}
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct kunit_suite ext4_mballoc_test_suite = {
>> + .name = "ext4_mballoc_test",
>> + .init = mballoc_test_init,
>> + .exit = mballoc_test_exit,
>> + .test_cases = ext4_mballoc_test_cases,
>> +};
>> +
>> +kunit_test_suites(&ext4_mballoc_test_suite);
>> +
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
>> index dd2fc0546c0b..b6b963412cdc 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
>> @@ -6954,3 +6954,7 @@ ext4_mballoc_query_range(
>>
>> return error;
>> }
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS
>> +#include "mballoc-test.c"
>> +#endif
>> --
>> 2.30.0
>
--
Best wishes
Kemeng Shi
