Re: [PATCH] jbd2: Remove unused t_handle_lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Wang Jianjian <wangjianjian0@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jbd2: Remove unused t_handle_lock
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2023 08:20:27 -0400
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>, Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <tencent_8477CBE568348A1862C64E393D587B342008@qq.com>
References: <tencent_8477CBE568348A1862C64E393D587B342008@qq.com>

On Wed, 02 Aug 2023 22:45:34 +0800, Wang Jianjian wrote:
> Since commit f7f497cb7024 ("jbd2: kill t_handle_lock
> transaction spinlock"), this lock has been no use.
> 
> 

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] jbd2: Remove unused t_handle_lock
      commit: e15e117bbbe18258a5ad506bbf6c58ff129c9576

Best regards,
-- 
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH] jbd2: Remove unused t_handle_lock
  - From: Wang Jianjian

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Don't use CR_BEST_AVAIL_LEN for non-regular files
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3] ext4: fix memory leaks in ext4_fname_{setup_filename,prepare_lookup}
Previous by thread: [PATCH] jbd2: Remove unused t_handle_lock
Next by thread: [PATCH v2] ext4: mballoc: avoid garbage value from err
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Reiser Filesystem Development] [Ceph FS] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Yosemite National Park] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux