[PATCH v10 rebased on v6.4 22/25] dept: Apply timeout consideration to dma fence wait

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Now that CONFIG_DEPT_AGGRESSIVE_TIMEOUT_WAIT was introduced, apply the
consideration to dma fence wait.

Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul@xxxxxx>
---
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
index ad2d7a94c868..ab10b228a147 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
@@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ dma_fence_default_wait(struct dma_fence *fence, bool intr, signed long timeout)
 	cb.task = current;
 	list_add(&cb.base.node, &fence->cb_list);
 
-	sdt_might_sleep_start(NULL);
+	sdt_might_sleep_start_timeout(NULL, timeout);
 	while (!test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags) && ret > 0) {
 		if (intr)
 			__set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
@@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ dma_fence_wait_any_timeout(struct dma_fence **fences, uint32_t count,
 		}
 	}
 
-	sdt_might_sleep_start(NULL);
+	sdt_might_sleep_start_timeout(NULL, timeout);
 	while (ret > 0) {
 		if (intr)
 			set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-- 
2.17.1




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux