On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 01:20:47PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 10:32:53PM -0700, Sean Greenslade wrote: > > Hello, folks. > > > > I noticed a change in behavior of ext4 in recent kernels. I make use of > > several luks loopback images formatted as ext4 that I mount read-only > > most of the time. I use rsync to synchronize the backing images between > > machines. In the past, mouning the images as read-only would not touch > > the backing image contents at all, but recently this changed. Every > > mount, even ones that are RO from the start, will cause some small > > writes to the backing image and thus force rsync to scan the whole file. > > > > I confirmed that the issue is still present on v6.4.rc6, so I performed > > a bisect and landed on the following commit: > > > > > eee00237fa5ec8f704f7323b54e48cc34e2d9168 is the first bad commit > > > commit eee00237fa5ec8f704f7323b54e48cc34e2d9168 > > > Author: Ye Bin <yebin10@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Date: Tue Mar 7 14:17:02 2023 +0800 > > > > > > ext4: commit super block if fs record error when journal record without error > > > > That certainly looks like a likely cause of my issue, but I'm not > > familiar enough with the ext4 code to diagnose any further. Please let > > me know if you need any additional information, or if you would like me > > to test anything. > > > > Can you show dmesg when regression happens? > > Ye: It looks like this regression is caused by your commit. Would you like > to take a look on it? > > Anyway, thanks for the bug report. I'm adding it to regzbot: > > #regzbot ^introduced: eee00237fa5ec8 > #regzbot title: commit super block writes even in read-only filesystems > Hi Thorsten, No reply so far from the culprit author (Ye Bin) nor from Ted. Can you help in this case? Thanks. -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
