Re: [PATCH v3 11/19] ext4: fix wrong unit use in ext4_mb_new_blocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 07:06:09PM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> Function ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple needs count in cluster. Function

So there seems to be a typo in the commit header and commit message. I believe
you mean ext4_mb_free_blocks() and ext4_mb_free_blocks_simple() ?

If that is the case, once corrected feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ext4_mb_new_blocks accepts count in block. Convert count to cluster
> to fix the mismatch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index 4a345e3c1c78..6d4471fd3049 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -6315,7 +6315,7 @@ void ext4_free_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (sbi->s_mount_state & EXT4_FC_REPLAY) {
> -		ext4_free_blocks_simple(inode, block, count);
> +		ext4_free_blocks_simple(inode, block, EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, count));
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.30.0
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux