Re: [PATCH 2/3] ext4: reflect error codes from ext4_multi_mount_protect() to its callers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023/4/28 11:16, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
This will allow more fine-grained errno codes to be returned by the
mount system call.

Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
---
  fs/ext4/mmp.c   |  9 ++++++++-
  fs/ext4/super.c | 14 +++++++++-----
  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/mmp.c b/fs/ext4/mmp.c
index 4681fff6665f..4022bc713421 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mmp.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mmp.c
@@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ int ext4_multi_mount_protect(struct super_block *sb,
  	if (mmp_block < le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block) ||
  	    mmp_block >= ext4_blocks_count(es)) {
  		ext4_warning(sb, "Invalid MMP block in superblock");
+		retval = -EINVAL;
  		goto failed;
  	}
@@ -307,6 +308,7 @@ int ext4_multi_mount_protect(struct super_block *sb, if (seq == EXT4_MMP_SEQ_FSCK) {
  		dump_mmp_msg(sb, mmp, "fsck is running on the filesystem");
+		retval = -EBUSY;
  		goto failed;
  	}
@@ -320,6 +322,7 @@ int ext4_multi_mount_protect(struct super_block *sb, if (schedule_timeout_interruptible(HZ * wait_time) != 0) {
  		ext4_warning(sb, "MMP startup interrupted, failing mount\n");
+		retval = -ETIMEDOUT;
  		goto failed;
  	}
@@ -330,6 +333,7 @@ int ext4_multi_mount_protect(struct super_block *sb,
  	if (seq != le32_to_cpu(mmp->mmp_seq)) {
  		dump_mmp_msg(sb, mmp,
  			     "Device is already active on another node.");
+		retval = -EBUSY;
  		goto failed;
  	}
@@ -349,6 +353,7 @@ int ext4_multi_mount_protect(struct super_block *sb,
  	 */
  	if (schedule_timeout_interruptible(HZ * wait_time) != 0) {
  		ext4_warning(sb, "MMP startup interrupted, failing mount");
+		retval = -ETIMEDOUT;
  		goto failed;
  	}
@@ -359,6 +364,7 @@ int ext4_multi_mount_protect(struct super_block *sb,
  	if (seq != le32_to_cpu(mmp->mmp_seq)) {
  		dump_mmp_msg(sb, mmp,
  			     "Device is already active on another node.");
+		retval = -EBUSY;
  		goto failed;
  	}
@@ -378,6 +384,7 @@ int ext4_multi_mount_protect(struct super_block *sb,
  		EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mmp_tsk = NULL;
  		ext4_warning(sb, "Unable to create kmmpd thread for %s.",
  			     sb->s_id);
+		retval = -ENOMEM;
  		goto failed;
  	}
@@ -385,5 +392,5 @@ int ext4_multi_mount_protect(struct super_block *sb, failed:
  	brelse(bh);
-	return 1;
+	return retval;
  }
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index b11907e1fab2..9a8af70815b1 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -5329,9 +5329,11 @@ static int __ext4_fill_super(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
  			  ext4_has_feature_orphan_present(sb) ||
  			  ext4_has_feature_journal_needs_recovery(sb));
- if (ext4_has_feature_mmp(sb) && !sb_rdonly(sb))
-		if (ext4_multi_mount_protect(sb, le64_to_cpu(es->s_mmp_block)))
+	if (ext4_has_feature_mmp(sb) && !sb_rdonly(sb)) {
+		err = ext4_multi_mount_protect(sb, le64_to_cpu(es->s_mmp_block));
+		if (err)
  			goto failed_mount3a;
+	}
/*
  	 * The first inode we look at is the journal inode.  Don't try
@@ -6566,12 +6568,14 @@ static int __ext4_remount(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
  				goto restore_opts;
sb->s_flags &= ~SB_RDONLY;
-			if (ext4_has_feature_mmp(sb))
-				if (ext4_multi_mount_protect(sb,
-						le64_to_cpu(es->s_mmp_block))) {
+			if (ext4_has_feature_mmp(sb)) {
+				err = ext4_multi_mount_protect(sb,
+						le64_to_cpu(es->s_mmp_block));
+				if (err) {
  					err = -EROFS;

So shall we return the fine-grained errno from ext4_multi_mount_protect() instead of -EROFS here?

Thanks,
Jason



[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux