The naming styles are different for some functions with 'check' in their
names. Some of them are like:
ext4_check_quota_consistency
ext4_check_test_dummy_encryption
ext4_check_opt_consistency
ext4_check_descriptors
ext4_check_feature_compatibility
While the others looks like below:
ext4_geometry_check
ext4_journal_data_mode_check
This is not a big deal and boils down to personal preference. But I'd
like to make them consistent.
Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/super.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index ed7bd3bb45f2..66f0da764d58 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -4713,7 +4713,7 @@ static int ext4_check_feature_compatibility(struct super_block *sb,
return 0;
}
-static int ext4_geometry_check(struct super_block *sb,
+static int ext4_check_geometry(struct super_block *sb,
struct ext4_super_block *es)
{
struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
@@ -4922,7 +4922,7 @@ static int ext4_load_and_init_journal(struct super_block *sb,
return -EINVAL;
}
-static int ext4_journal_data_mode_check(struct super_block *sb)
+static int ext4_check_journal_data_mode(struct super_block *sb)
{
if (test_opt(sb, DATA_FLAGS) == EXT4_MOUNT_JOURNAL_DATA) {
printk_once(KERN_WARNING "EXT4-fs: Warning: mounting with "
@@ -5162,7 +5162,7 @@ static int __ext4_fill_super(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
if (ext4_encoding_init(sb, es))
goto failed_mount;
- if (ext4_journal_data_mode_check(sb))
+ if (ext4_check_journal_data_mode(sb))
goto failed_mount;
sb->s_flags = (sb->s_flags & ~SB_POSIXACL) |
@@ -5264,7 +5264,7 @@ static int __ext4_fill_super(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
goto failed_mount;
}
- if (ext4_geometry_check(sb, es))
+ if (ext4_check_geometry(sb, es))
goto failed_mount;
timer_setup(&sbi->s_err_report, print_daily_error_info, 0);
--
2.31.1
