On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 09:51:22AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 04:12:05PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > It's more useful to return the original string with strreplace(), > > I found the use of "original" confusing here and in the comments. This > just returns arg 1, yes? i.e. it's not the original (unreplaced) string, > but rather just the string itself. Yes. Okay, I will try my best as non-native speaker to fix that for v2. Meanwhile I'm open ears for the better suggestions. > I agree, though, that's much more useful than a pointer to the end of > the string. Thank you! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
