On Wed 15-03-23 09:31:24, Zhihao Cheng wrote: > As discussed in [1], 'sbi->s_journal_bdev != sb->s_bdev' will always > become true if sbi->s_journal_bdev exists. Filesystem block device and > journal block device are both opened with 'FMODE_EXCL' mode, so these > two devices can't be same one. Then we can remove the redundant checking > 'sbi->s_journal_bdev != sb->s_bdev' if 'sbi->s_journal_bdev' exists. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/f86584f6-3877-ff18-47a1-2efaa12d18b2@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@xxxxxxxxxx> Looks good. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Honza > --- > fs/ext4/super.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c > index 61511b7ba017..a22417d113ca 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/super.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c > @@ -1277,7 +1277,7 @@ static void ext4_put_super(struct super_block *sb) > > sync_blockdev(sb->s_bdev); > invalidate_bdev(sb->s_bdev); > - if (sbi->s_journal_bdev && sbi->s_journal_bdev != sb->s_bdev) { > + if (sbi->s_journal_bdev) { > sync_blockdev(sbi->s_journal_bdev); > ext4_blkdev_remove(sbi); > } > -- > 2.31.1 > -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR