On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 02:07:34PM +0800, Yangtao Li wrote: > Just for better readability, no code logic change. > > Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@xxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/ext4/inode.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c > index d251d705c276..d121cde74522 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c > @@ -2218,8 +2218,7 @@ static int mpage_process_page_bufs(struct mpage_da_data *mpd, > { > struct inode *inode = mpd->inode; > int err; > - ext4_lblk_t blocks = (i_size_read(inode) + i_blocksize(inode) - 1) > - >> inode->i_blkbits; > + ext4_lblk_t blocks = DIV_ROUND_UP(i_size_read(inode), i_blocksize(inode)); > Please don't do this. This makes the code compile down to a division, which is far less efficient. I've verified this by checking the assembly generated. - Eric