[PATCH 3/7] ext4: call ext4_bg_num_gdb_[no]meta directly in ext4_num_base_meta_clusters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



ext4_num_base_meta_clusters is already aware of meta_bg feature and test
if block_group is inside real meta block groups before calling
ext4_bg_num_gdb. Then ext4_bg_num_gdb will check if block group is inside
a real meta block groups again to decide either ext4_bg_num_gdb_meta or
ext4_bg_num_gdb_nometa is needed.
Call ext4_bg_num_gdb_meta or ext4_bg_num_gdb_nometa directly after we
check if block_group is inside a meta block groups in
ext4_num_base_meta_clusters to remove redundant check of meta block
groups in ext4_bg_num_gdb.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/ext4/balloc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/balloc.c b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
index 22be5cd70505..9b8a32b90ddc 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
@@ -889,11 +889,11 @@ static unsigned ext4_num_base_meta_clusters(struct super_block *sb,
 	    block_group < le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_meta_bg) *
 			  sbi->s_desc_per_block) {
 		if (num) {
-			num += ext4_bg_num_gdb(sb, block_group);
+			num += ext4_bg_num_gdb_nometa(sb, block_group);
 			num += le16_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_reserved_gdt_blocks);
 		}
 	} else { /* For META_BG_BLOCK_GROUPS */
-		num += ext4_bg_num_gdb(sb, block_group);
+		num += ext4_bg_num_gdb_meta(sb, block_group);
 	}
 	return EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, num);
 }
-- 
2.30.0




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux