On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 07:05:51PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote: > Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@xxxxxxxxx> No patch description, really? > --- > Documentation/filesystems/ext4/about.rst | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/about.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/about.rst > index cc76b577d2f4..c150519bbf3f 100644 > --- a/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/about.rst > +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/about.rst > @@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ created demonstration filesystems. > > License > ------- > -This book is licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License, v2. > +This book is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License, > +v2. The doc has already SPDX identifier above. Please remmove the sentence above instead. In recent days, I have seen the sudden influx of s/GNU Public License/GNU General Public License/g patches from you, for which many developers ask you to replace with SPDX identifier instead (see [1], [2], and [3]). Please do a tree-wide SPDX patch. Thanks. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ad99d227-ce82-319b-6323-b70ac009d0e7@xxxxxxxxxxxx/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6d9053c6-b56e-51f4-db47-79264f1f5672@xxxxxxxxxx/ [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230122111707.68ddead6@hermes.local/ -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
