On Fri 13-01-23 18:02:05, Ye Bin wrote:
> From: Ye Bin <yebin10@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Syzbot found the following issue:
>
> EXT4-fs: Warning: mounting with data=journal disables delayed allocation, dioread_nolock, O_DIRECT and fast_commit support!
> EXT4-fs (loop0): orphan cleanup on readonly fs
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5067 at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:1869 mb_find_extent+0x8a1/0xe30
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 1 PID: 5067 Comm: syz-executor307 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc1-syzkaller #0
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022
> RIP: 0010:mb_find_extent+0x8a1/0xe30 fs/ext4/mballoc.c:1869
> RSP: 0018:ffffc90003c9e098 EFLAGS: 00010293
> RAX: ffffffff82405731 RBX: 0000000000000041 RCX: ffff8880783457c0
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000041 RDI: 0000000000000040
> RBP: 0000000000000040 R08: ffffffff82405723 R09: ffffed10053c9402
> R10: ffffed10053c9402 R11: 1ffff110053c9401 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: ffffc90003c9e538 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffffc90003c9e2cc
> FS: 0000555556665300(0000) GS:ffff8880b9900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 000056312f6796f8 CR3: 0000000022437000 CR4: 00000000003506e0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> ext4_mb_complex_scan_group+0x353/0x1100 fs/ext4/mballoc.c:2307
> ext4_mb_regular_allocator+0x1533/0x3860 fs/ext4/mballoc.c:2735
> ext4_mb_new_blocks+0xddf/0x3db0 fs/ext4/mballoc.c:5605
> ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x1868/0x6880 fs/ext4/extents.c:4286
> ext4_map_blocks+0xa49/0x1cc0 fs/ext4/inode.c:651
> ext4_getblk+0x1b9/0x770 fs/ext4/inode.c:864
> ext4_bread+0x2a/0x170 fs/ext4/inode.c:920
> ext4_quota_write+0x225/0x570 fs/ext4/super.c:7105
> write_blk fs/quota/quota_tree.c:64 [inline]
> get_free_dqblk+0x34a/0x6d0 fs/quota/quota_tree.c:130
> do_insert_tree+0x26b/0x1aa0 fs/quota/quota_tree.c:340
> do_insert_tree+0x722/0x1aa0 fs/quota/quota_tree.c:375
> do_insert_tree+0x722/0x1aa0 fs/quota/quota_tree.c:375
> do_insert_tree+0x722/0x1aa0 fs/quota/quota_tree.c:375
> dq_insert_tree fs/quota/quota_tree.c:401 [inline]
> qtree_write_dquot+0x3b6/0x530 fs/quota/quota_tree.c:420
> v2_write_dquot+0x11b/0x190 fs/quota/quota_v2.c:358
> dquot_acquire+0x348/0x670 fs/quota/dquot.c:444
> ext4_acquire_dquot+0x2dc/0x400 fs/ext4/super.c:6740
> dqget+0x999/0xdc0 fs/quota/dquot.c:914
> __dquot_initialize+0x3d0/0xcf0 fs/quota/dquot.c:1492
> ext4_process_orphan+0x57/0x2d0 fs/ext4/orphan.c:329
> ext4_orphan_cleanup+0xb60/0x1340 fs/ext4/orphan.c:474
> __ext4_fill_super fs/ext4/super.c:5516 [inline]
> ext4_fill_super+0x81cd/0x8700 fs/ext4/super.c:5644
> get_tree_bdev+0x400/0x620 fs/super.c:1282
> vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x270 fs/super.c:1489
> do_new_mount+0x289/0xad0 fs/namespace.c:3145
> do_mount fs/namespace.c:3488 [inline]
> __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3697 [inline]
> __se_sys_mount+0x2d3/0x3c0 fs/namespace.c:3674
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>
> Add some debug information:
> mb_find_extent: mb_find_extent block=41, order=0 needed=64 next=0 ex=0/41/1@3735929054 64 64 7
> block_bitmap: ff 3f 0c 00 fc 01 00 00 d2 3d 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>
> Acctually, blocks per group is 64, but block bitmap indicate at least has
> 128 blocks. Now, ext4_validate_block_bitmap() didn't check invalid block's
> bitmap if set.
> To resolve above issue, add check like fsck "Padding at end of block bitmap is
> not set".
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+68223fe9f6c95ad43bed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@xxxxxxxxxx>
A few smaller comments below.
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/balloc.c b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> index 8ff4b9192a9f..8c9d3bc712c8 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> @@ -303,6 +303,23 @@ struct ext4_group_desc * ext4_get_group_desc(struct super_block *sb,
> return desc;
> }
>
> +static ext4_fsblk_t ext4_valid_block_bitmap_padding(struct super_block *sb,
> + ext4_group_t block_group,
> + struct buffer_head *bh)
> +{
> + ext4_grpblk_t next_zero_bit;
> + unsigned long blocksize = EXT4_NUM_B2C(EXT4_SB(sb),
> + (sb->s_blocksize * 8));
Maybe call this "bitmap_size" because that's the meaning of the variable
AFAIU? Also shouldn't it be just sb->s_blocksize * 8? Because we want the
block to be filled with 1's upto the end regardless of a possible cluster
size?
Honza
> + unsigned int offset = num_clusters_in_group(sb, block_group);
> +
> + if (blocksize <= offset)
> + return 0;
> +
> + next_zero_bit = ext4_find_next_zero_bit(bh->b_data, blocksize, offset);
> +
> + return (next_zero_bit < blocksize ? next_zero_bit : 0);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Return the block number which was discovered to be invalid, or 0 if
> * the block bitmap is valid.
> @@ -401,6 +418,15 @@ static int ext4_validate_block_bitmap(struct super_block *sb,
> EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
> return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> }
> + blk = ext4_valid_block_bitmap_padding(sb, block_group, bh);
> + if (unlikely(blk != 0)) {
> + ext4_unlock_group(sb, block_group);
> + ext4_error(sb, "bg %u: block %llu: padding at end of block bitmap is not set",
> + block_group, blk);
> + ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, block_group,
> + EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
> + return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> + }
> set_buffer_verified(bh);
> verified:
> ext4_unlock_group(sb, block_group);
> --
> 2.31.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
