On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 09:45:02AM +0800, Jun Nie wrote:
> For 1k-block filesystems, the filesystem starts at block 1, not block 0.
> If start_fsb is 0, it will be bump up to s_first_data_block. Then
> ext4_get_group_no_and_offset don't know what to do and return garbage
> results (blockgroup 2^32-1). The underflow make index
> exceed es->s_groups_count in ext4_get_group_info() and trigger the BUG_ON.
>
> Fixes: 4a4956249dac0 ("ext4: fix off-by-one fsmap error on 1k block filesystems")
> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=79d5768e9bfe362911ac1a5057a36fc6b5c30002
> Reported-by: syzbot+6be2b977c89f79b6b153@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/ext4/fsmap.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/fsmap.c b/fs/ext4/fsmap.c
> index 4493ef0c715e..1aef127b0634 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/fsmap.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/fsmap.c
> @@ -702,6 +702,12 @@ int ext4_getfsmap(struct super_block *sb, struct ext4_fsmap_head *head,
> if (handlers[i].gfd_dev > head->fmh_keys[0].fmr_device)
> memset(&dkeys[0], 0, sizeof(struct ext4_fsmap));
>
> + /*
> + * Re-check the range after above limit operation and reject
> + * 1K fs on block 0 as fs should start block 1. */
> + if (dkeys[0].fmr_physical ==0 && dkeys[1].fmr_physical == 0)
> + continue;
...and if this filesystem has 4k blocks, and therefore *does* define a
block 0?
--D
> +
> info.gfi_dev = handlers[i].gfd_dev;
> info.gfi_last = false;
> info.gfi_agno = -1;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
