Re: [RFCv1 17/72] libext2fs: Add support for ext2fs_test_block_bitmap_range2_valid()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Nov 7, 2022, at 5:21 AM, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> From: Wang Shilong <wshilong@xxxxxxx>
> 
> This adds the support in libext2fs to query whether the block range is
> valid or not (within range) given the block bitmap.
> Also to avoid duplicate warning messages in case of invalid blocks.
> 
> This will be later used in pass1 of e2fsck is_blocks_used() function to
> check whether the given block range is valid or not to avoid duplicate
> warning resulting from ext2fs_test_block_bitmap_range2()
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wshilong@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx>

I don't think this patch is correct?

> ---
> diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/gen_bitmap64.c b/lib/ext2fs/gen_bitmap64.c
> index c31f942f..a9637cb5 100644
> --- a/lib/ext2fs/gen_bitmap64.c
> +++ b/lib/ext2fs/gen_bitmap64.c
> @@ -731,6 +731,39 @@ int ext2fs_test_block_bitmap_range2(ext2fs_block_bitmap gen_bmap,
> 	return bmap->bitmap_ops->test_clear_bmap_extent(bmap, block, num);
> }
> 
> +int ext2fs_test_block_bitmap_range2_valid(ext2fs_block_bitmap bitmap,
> +					  blk64_t block, unsigned int num)
> +{
> +	ext2fs_generic_bitmap_64 bmap = (ext2fs_generic_bitmap_64)bitmap;
> +	__u64	end = block + num;
> +
> +	if (!bmap)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (EXT2FS_IS_32_BITMAP(bmap)) {
> +		if ((block & ~0xffffffffULL) ||
> +		    ((block+num-1) & ~0xffffffffULL)) {
> +			return 0;
> +		}
> +	}

This is bailing out early if the requested bit is > 2^32, but that is
before cluster conversion below.  However, I think the bitmap is actually
stored in clusters, so the 2^32 check seems premature?

> +
> +	if (!EXT2FS_IS_64_BITMAP(bmap))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* convert to clusters if necessary */
> +	block >>= bmap->cluster_bits;
> +	end += (1 << bmap->cluster_bits) - 1;
> +	end >>= bmap->cluster_bits;
> +	num = end - block;
> +
> +	if ((block < bmap->start) || (block > bmap->end) ||
> +	    (block+num-1 > bmap->end))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return 1;
> +}

Cheers, Andreas





Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux