https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216807 Bug ID: 216807 Summary: [Syzkaller & bisect] There is "possible deadlock in ext4_bmap" issue in v6.1 kernel Product: File System Version: 2.5 Kernel Version: v6.1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Tree: Mainline Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: ext4 Assignee: fs_ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Reporter: pengfei.xu@xxxxxxxxx Regression: No There is "possible deadlock in ext4_bmap" issue in v6.1 kernel: " [ 28.421104] [ 28.421671] ====================================================== [ 28.422016] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 28.422358] 6.1.0-830b3c68c1fb #1 Not tainted [ 28.422607] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 28.422956] repro/588 is trying to acquire lock: [ 28.423217] ff110000060e5980 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){++++}-{3:3}, at: ext4_bmap+0x39/0x1c0 [ 28.423729] [ 28.423729] but task is already holding lock: [ 28.424055] ff110000093323f8 (&journal->j_checkpoint_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: jbd2_journal_flush+0x267/0x5f0 [ 28.424610] [ 28.424610] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 28.424610] [ 28.425057] [ 28.425057] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 28.425467] [ 28.425467] -> #3 (&journal->j_checkpoint_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 28.425877] mutex_lock_io_nested+0xad/0xd60 [ 28.426156] jbd2_journal_flush+0xcf/0x5f0 [ 28.426429] __ext4_ioctl+0x225/0x25c0 [ 28.426680] ext4_ioctl+0x2e/0x40 [ 28.426908] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x10e/0x160 [ 28.427171] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 [ 28.427417] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 28.427739] [ 28.427739] -> #2 (&journal->j_barrier){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 28.428105] __mutex_lock+0x9c/0xf30 [ 28.428342] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 28.428600] jbd2_journal_lock_updates+0xbe/0x1a0 [ 28.428909] ext4_change_inode_journal_flag+0xd4/0x2c0 [ 28.429234] ext4_fileattr_set+0x86d/0xe60 [ 28.429501] vfs_fileattr_set+0x365/0x4e0 [ 28.429765] do_vfs_ioctl+0x378/0xcc0 [ 28.430010] __x64_sys_ioctl+0xca/0x160 [ 28.430265] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 [ 28.430508] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 28.430832] [ 28.430832] -> #1 (&sbi->s_writepages_rwsem){++++}-{0:0}: [ 28.431224] percpu_down_write+0x4d/0x2d0 [ 28.431487] ext4_ind_migrate+0xcc/0x390 [ 28.431748] ext4_fileattr_set+0xbba/0xe60 [ 28.432018] vfs_fileattr_set+0x365/0x4e0 [ 28.432280] do_vfs_ioctl+0x378/0xcc0 [ 28.432525] __x64_sys_ioctl+0xca/0x160 [ 28.432780] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 [ 28.433027] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 28.433349] [ 28.433349] -> #0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){++++}-{3:3}: [ 28.433751] __lock_acquire+0x1023/0x1d20 [ 28.434022] lock_acquire+0xd6/0x2f0 [ 28.434259] down_read+0x45/0x160 [ 28.434483] ext4_bmap+0x39/0x1c0 [ 28.434718] bmap+0x40/0x70 [ 28.434925] jbd2_journal_bmap+0x61/0xe0 [ 28.435186] jbd2_journal_flush+0x461/0x5f0 [ 28.435459] __ext4_ioctl+0x225/0x25c0 [ 28.435708] ext4_ioctl+0x2e/0x40 [ 28.435935] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x10e/0x160 [ 28.436193] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 [ 28.436436] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 28.436757] [ 28.436757] other info that might help us debug this: [ 28.436757] [ 28.437194] Chain exists of: [ 28.437194] &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8 --> &journal->j_barrier --> &journal->j_checkpoint_mutex [ 28.437194] [ 28.437924] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 28.437924] [ 28.438251] CPU0 CPU1 [ 28.438505] ---- ---- [ 28.438759] lock(&journal->j_checkpoint_mutex); [ 28.439030] lock(&journal->j_barrier); [ 28.439388] lock(&journal->j_checkpoint_mutex); [ 28.439788] lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8); [ 28.440052] [ 28.440052] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 28.440052] [ 28.440378] 2 locks held by repro/588: [ 28.440595] #0: ff11000009332170 (&journal->j_barrier){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: jbd2_journal_lock_updates+0xbe/0x1a0 [ 28.441168] #1: ff110000093323f8 (&journal->j_checkpoint_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: jbd2_journal_flush+0x267/0x5f0 [ 28.441746] [ 28.441746] stack backtrace: [ 28.441994] CPU: 1 PID: 588 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.1.0-830b3c68c1fb #1 [ 28.442375] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 28.443004] Call Trace: [ 28.443148] <TASK> [ 28.443275] dump_stack_lvl+0xa7/0xdb [ 28.443497] dump_stack+0x19/0x1f [ 28.443699] print_circular_bug.isra.46.cold.67+0x13e/0x143 [ 28.444031] check_noncircular+0x102/0x120 [ 28.444277] ? write_comp_data+0x2f/0x90 [ 28.444508] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x25/0x60 [ 28.444783] __lock_acquire+0x1023/0x1d20 [ 28.445025] lock_acquire+0xd6/0x2f0 [ 28.445236] ? ext4_bmap+0x39/0x1c0 [ 28.445453] down_read+0x45/0x160 [ 28.445652] ? ext4_bmap+0x39/0x1c0 [ 28.445865] ? ext4_invalidate_folio+0x1e0/0x1e0 [ 28.446143] ext4_bmap+0x39/0x1c0 [ 28.446347] ? ext4_invalidate_folio+0x1e0/0x1e0 [ 28.446622] bmap+0x40/0x70 [ 28.446800] jbd2_journal_bmap+0x61/0xe0 [ 28.447038] jbd2_journal_flush+0x461/0x5f0 [ 28.447287] __ext4_ioctl+0x225/0x25c0 [ 28.447510] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x25/0x60 [ 28.447782] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xb8/0xcc0 [ 28.448006] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x25/0x60 [ 28.448281] ext4_ioctl+0x2e/0x40 [ 28.448480] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x10e/0x160 [ 28.448712] ? ext4_fileattr_set+0xe60/0xe60 [ 28.448964] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 [ 28.449183] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 28.449479] RIP: 0033:0x7f839e4b959d [ 28.449689] Code: 00 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 8 [ 28.450702] RSP: 002b:00007ffd48343808 EFLAGS: 00000217 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [ 28.451127] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f839e4b959d [ 28.451523] RDX: 0000000020000080 RSI: 000000004004662b RDI: 0000000000000004 [ 28.451922] RBP: 00007ffd48343820 R08: 00007ffd48343900 R09: 00007ffd48343900 [ 28.452317] R10: 00007ffd48343900 R11: 0000000000000217 R12: 0000000000401060 [ 28.452712] R13: 00007ffd48343900 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 28.453116] </TASK> [ 28.675120] warning: checkpointing journal with EXT4_IOC_CHECKPOINT_FLAG_ZEROOUT can be slow [ 28.898857] warning: checkpointing journal with EXT4_IOC_CHECKPOINT_FLAG_ZEROOUT can be slow [ 29.121957] warning: checkpointing journal with EXT4_IOC_CHECKPOINT_FLAG_ZEROOUT can be slow [ 29.343926] warning: checkpointing journal with EXT4_IOC_CHECKPOINT_FLAG_ZEROOUT can be slow [ 29.563709] warning: checkpointing journal with EXT4_IOC_CHECKPOINT_FLAG_ZEROOUT can be slow [ 29.783732] warning: checkpointing journal with EXT4_IOC_CHECKPOINT_FLAG_ZEROOUT can be slow [ 30.002988] warning: checkpointing journal with EXT4_IOC_CHECKPOINT_FLAG_ZEROOUT can be slow [ 30.222407] warning: checkpointing journal with EXT4_IOC_CHECKPOINT_FLAG_ZEROOUT can be slow [ 30.442175] warning: checkpointing journal with EXT4_IOC_CHECKPOINT_FLAG_ZEROOUT can be slow [ 33.495841] ext4_ioctl_checkpoint: 13 callbacks suppressed [ 33.495853] warning: checkpointing journal with EXT4_IOC_CHECKPOINT_FLAG_ZEROOUT can be slow [ 33.714325] warning: checkpointing journal with EXT4_IOC_CHECKPOINT_FLAG_ZEROOUT can be slow [ 33.932831] warning: checkpointing journal with EXT4_IOC_CHECKPOINT_FLAG_ZEROOUT can be slow [ 34.151299] warning: checkpointing journal with EXT4_IOC_CHECKPOINT_FLAG_ZEROOUT can be slow [ 34.370576] warning: checkpointing journal with EXT4_IOC_CHECKPOINT_FLAG_ZEROOUT can be slow [ 34.589091] warning: checkpointing journal with EXT4_IOC_CHECKPOINT_FLAG_ZEROOUT can be slow [ 34.808403] warning: checkpointing journal with EXT4_IOC_CHECKPOINT_FLAG_ZEROOUT can be slow [ 35.028663] warning: checkpointing journal with EXT4_IOC_CHECKPOINT_FLAG_ZEROOUT can be slow [ 35.247587] warning: checkpointing journal with EXT4_IOC_CHECKPOINT_FLAG_ZEROOUT can be slow " Bisect and found that, the first bad commit is: 51ae846cff568c8c29921b1b28eb2dfbcd4ac12d ext4: fix warning in ext4_iomap_begin as race between bmap and write After reverted the bad commit on top of v6.1, this issue was gone. All above bisect info, kconfig, reproduced code from syzkaller is in link: https://github.com/xupengfe/syzkaller_logs/tree/main/221212_234319_ext4_bmap ============================================================================ There was one more similar "possible deadlock in jbd2_journal_lock_updates" issue found by syzkaller, and bisected and found that the first bad commit is also 51ae846cff568c8c29921b1b28eb2dfbcd4ac12d Reverted above commit on top of v6.1, the jbd2_journal_lock_updates issue was gone also. Related issue bisect info, reproduced code is in link: https://github.com/xupengfe/syzkaller_logs/tree/main/221213_160256_jbd2_journal_lock_updates Thanks! -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.
