kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1914 - page_buffers()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

Starting with kernel 5.15 for the past eight months we have a total of 12 kernel panics at a fleet of 1000 KVM/Qemu machines which look the following way:

    kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1914

Switching from kernel 4.14 to 5.15 almost immediately triggered the problem. Therefore we are very confident that userland activity is more or less the same and is not the root cause. The kernel function which triggers the BUG is __ext4_journalled_writepage(). In 5.15 the code for __ext4_journalled_writepage() in "fs/ext4/inode.c" is the same as the current kernel "master". The line where the BUG is triggered is:

    struct buffer_head *page_bufs = page_buffers(page)

The definition of "page_buffers(page)" in "include/linux/buffer_head.h" hasn't changed since 4.14, so no difference here. This is where the actual "kernel BUG" event is triggered:

    /* If we *know* page->private refers to buffer_heads */
    #define page_buffers(page) \
        ({ \
            BUG_ON(!PagePrivate(page)); \
            ((struct buffer_head *)page_private(page)); \
        })
    #define page_has_buffers(page) PagePrivate(page)

Initially I thought that the issue is already discussed here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yg0m6IjcNmfaSokM@xxxxxxxxxx/ But this seems to be another (solved) problem and Theodore Ts'o already made a quick fix by simply reporting the rare occurrence and continuing forward. The commit is in 5.15 (and in the latest kernel), so it's not helping our case: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/cc5095747edfb054ca2068d01af20be3fcc3634f

Back to the problem! 99% of the difference between 4.14 and the latest kernel for __ext4_journalled_writepage() in "fs/ext4/inode.c" comes from the following commit: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/5c48a7df91499e371ef725895b2e2d21a126e227

Is it safe that we revert this patch on the latest 5.15 kernel, so that we can confirm if this resolves the issue for us?

Best regards.
--Ivan





[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux