From: Wang Shilong <wshilong@xxxxxxx> This should not be kept, the reaons is similar to what e2fsck_pass1 has done before. Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wshilong@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx> --- e2fsck/pass1.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/e2fsck/pass1.c b/e2fsck/pass1.c index 59ff888f..1a5fcf66 100644 --- a/e2fsck/pass1.c +++ b/e2fsck/pass1.c @@ -2925,6 +2925,11 @@ static int e2fsck_pass1_thread_join_one(e2fsck_t global_ctx, e2fsck_t thread_ctx global_ctx->logf = global_logf; global_ctx->problem_logf = global_problem_logf; global_ctx->global_ctx = NULL; + /* + * The l+f inode may have been cleared, so zap it now and + * later passes will recalculate it if necessary + */ + global_ctx->lost_and_found = 0; global_fs->priv_data = global_ctx; global_ctx->fs = global_fs; -- 2.37.3