mb_set_largest_free_order() updates lists containing groups with largest chunk of free space of given order. The way it updates it leads to always moving the group to the tail of the list. Thus allocations looking for free space of given order effectively end up cycling through all groups (and due to initialization in last to first order). This spreads allocations among block groups which reduces performance for rotating disks or low-end flash media. Change mb_set_largest_free_order() to only update lists if the order of the largest free chunk in the group changed. Fixes: 196e402adf2e ("ext4: improve cr 0 / cr 1 group scanning") CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Reported-and-tested-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@xxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 24 +++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index 41e1cfecac3b..6251b4a6cc63 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -1077,23 +1077,25 @@ mb_set_largest_free_order(struct super_block *sb, struct ext4_group_info *grp) struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb); int i; - if (test_opt2(sb, MB_OPTIMIZE_SCAN) && grp->bb_largest_free_order >= 0) { + for (i = MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb) - 1; i >= 0; i--) + if (grp->bb_counters[i] > 0) + break; + /* No need to move between order lists? */ + if (!test_opt2(sb, MB_OPTIMIZE_SCAN) || + i == grp->bb_largest_free_order) { + grp->bb_largest_free_order = i; + return; + } + + if (grp->bb_largest_free_order >= 0) { write_lock(&sbi->s_mb_largest_free_orders_locks[ grp->bb_largest_free_order]); list_del_init(&grp->bb_largest_free_order_node); write_unlock(&sbi->s_mb_largest_free_orders_locks[ grp->bb_largest_free_order]); } - grp->bb_largest_free_order = -1; /* uninit */ - - for (i = MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb) - 1; i >= 0; i--) { - if (grp->bb_counters[i] > 0) { - grp->bb_largest_free_order = i; - break; - } - } - if (test_opt2(sb, MB_OPTIMIZE_SCAN) && - grp->bb_largest_free_order >= 0 && grp->bb_free) { + grp->bb_largest_free_order = i; + if (grp->bb_largest_free_order >= 0 && grp->bb_free) { write_lock(&sbi->s_mb_largest_free_orders_locks[ grp->bb_largest_free_order]); list_add_tail(&grp->bb_largest_free_order_node, -- 2.35.3