Hi, On (22/08/09 10:20), Dmitry Rokosov wrote: > I think oom-kill is an inevitable escape from low memory situation if we > don't solve original problem with high memory consumption in the user > setup. Reclaim-based zram slow path just delays oom if memory eating > root cause is not resolved. > > I totally agree with you that all patches which have visible user > degradations should be reverted, but maybe this is more user setup > problem, what do you think? I'd go with the revert. Jiri, are you going to send the revert patch or shall I handle it? > If you make the decision to revert slow path removal patch, I would > prefer to review the original patch with unneeded code removal again > if you don't mind: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20220422115959.3313-1-avromanov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Sure, we can return to it after the merge window.
