On 22/06/21 02:39AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 11:28:40AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote: > > @@ -1636,14 +1636,12 @@ static int jbd2_write_superblock(journal_t *journal, int write_flags) > > sb->s_checksum = jbd2_superblock_csum(journal, sb); > > get_bh(bh); > > bh->b_end_io = end_buffer_write_sync; > > - ret = submit_bh(REQ_OP_WRITE, write_flags, bh); > > + submit_bh(REQ_OP_WRITE, write_flags, bh); > > wait_on_buffer(bh); > > if (buffer_write_io_error(bh)) { > > clear_buffer_write_io_error(bh); > > set_buffer_uptodate(bh); > > ret = -EIO; > > - } > > - if (ret) { > > printk(KERN_ERR "JBD2: Error %d detected when updating " > > "journal superblock for %s.\n", ret, > > journal->j_devname); > > Maybe rephrase the error message? And join it together to match the > current preferred style. > > printk(KERN_ERR "JBD2: I/O error when updating journal superblock for %s.\n", > journal->j_devname); Sure, I will update the printk message like above and send out a v3 (since I haven't receieved any other comments so I think v3 should be good to be picked up now) -ritesh