在 2022/5/28 23:12, Ritesh Harjani 写道:
On 22/05/28 07:00PM, Baokun Li wrote:
ext4_mb_normalize_request() can move logical start of allocated blocks
to reduce fragmentation and better utilize preallocation. However logical
block requested as a start of allocation (ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical) should
always be covered by allocated blocks so we should check that by
modifying and to or in the assertion.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Changes looks good to me as we discussed. Feel free to add -
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx>
---
V1->V2:
Change Fixes from dfe076c106f6 to c9de560ded61.
V2->V3:
Delete Fixes tag.
Add more comments and commit logs to make the code easier to understand.
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 4d3740fdff90..9e06334771a3 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -4185,7 +4185,22 @@ ext4_mb_normalize_request(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
}
rcu_read_unlock();
- if (start + size <= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical &&
+ /*
+ * In this function "start" and "size" are normalized for better
+ * alignment and length such that we could preallocate more blocks.
+ * This normalization is done such that original request of
+ * ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical & fe_len should always lie within "start" and
+ * "size" boundaries.
+ * (Note fe_len can be relaxed since FS block allocation API does not
+ * provide gurantee on number of contiguous blocks allocation since that
+ * depends upon free space left, etc).
+ * In case of inode pa, later we use the allocated blocks
+ * [pa_start + fe_logical - pa_lstart, fe_len/size] from the preallocated
+ * range of goal/best blocks [start, size] to put it at the
+ * ac_o_ex.fe_logical extent of this inode.
+ * (See ext4_mb_use_inode_pa() for more details)
+ */
+ if (start + size <= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical ||
start > ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical) {
ext4_msg(ac->ac_sb, KERN_ERR,
"start %lu, size %lu, fe_logical %lu",
--
2.31.1
.
Thank you for your review!
--
With Best Regards,
Baokun Li
