On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 10:37:47AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 10:19:11PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 10:19:26PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > > > This series updates the testing of the test_dummy_encryption mount > > > option in ext4/053. > > > > > > The first patch will be needed for the test to pass if the kernel patch > > > "ext4: only allow test_dummy_encryption when supported" > > > (https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220501050857.538984-2-ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx) > > > is applied. > > > > > > The second patch starts testing a case that previously wasn't tested. > > > It reproduces a bug that was introduced in the v5.17 kernel and will > > > be fixed by the kernel patch > > > "ext4: fix up test_dummy_encryption handling for new mount API" > > > (https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220501050857.538984-6-ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx). > > > > > > This applies on top of my recent patch > > > "ext4/053: fix the rejected mount option testing" > > > (https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220430192130.131842-1-ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx). > > > > Hi Eric, > > > > Your "ext4/053: fix the rejected mount option testing" has been merged. As the > > two kernel patches haven't been merged by upstream linux, I'd like to merge > > this patchset after the kernel patches be merged. (feel free to ping me, if > > I forget this:) > > Yes, I'm waiting for them to be applied. Thanks, I'll review this patches after your kernel patches be merged. Please remind me, if I don't notice that in time. > > > > > And I saw some discussion under this patchset, and no any RVB, so I'm wondering > > if you are still working/changing on it? > > > > I might add a check for kernel version >= 5.19 in patch 1. Otherwise I'm not > planning any more changes. Actually I don't think the kernel version check (in fstests) is a good method. Better to check a behavior/feature directly likes those "_require_*" functions. Why ext4/053 need >=5.12 or even >=5.19, what features restrict that? If some features testing might break the garden image (.out file), we can refer to _link_out_file(). Or even split this case to several small cases, make ext4/053 only test old stable behaviors. Then use other cases to test new features, and use _require_$feature_you_test for them (avoid the kernel version restriction). Thanks, Zorro > > - Eric >