Hulk Robot reported a BUG_ON:
==================================================================
kernel BUG at fs/ext4/extents_status.c:199!
[...]
RIP: 0010:ext4_es_end fs/ext4/extents_status.c:199 [inline]
RIP: 0010:__es_tree_search+0x1e0/0x260 fs/ext4/extents_status.c:217
[...]
Call Trace:
ext4_es_cache_extent+0x109/0x340 fs/ext4/extents_status.c:766
ext4_cache_extents+0x239/0x2e0 fs/ext4/extents.c:561
ext4_find_extent+0x6b7/0xa20 fs/ext4/extents.c:964
ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x16b/0x4b70 fs/ext4/extents.c:4384
ext4_map_blocks+0xe26/0x19f0 fs/ext4/inode.c:567
ext4_getblk+0x320/0x4c0 fs/ext4/inode.c:980
ext4_bread+0x2d/0x170 fs/ext4/inode.c:1031
ext4_quota_read+0x248/0x320 fs/ext4/super.c:6257
v2_read_header+0x78/0x110 fs/quota/quota_v2.c:63
v2_check_quota_file+0x76/0x230 fs/quota/quota_v2.c:82
vfs_load_quota_inode+0x5d1/0x1530 fs/quota/dquot.c:2368
dquot_enable+0x28a/0x330 fs/quota/dquot.c:2490
ext4_quota_enable fs/ext4/super.c:6137 [inline]
ext4_enable_quotas+0x5d7/0x960 fs/ext4/super.c:6163
ext4_fill_super+0xa7c9/0xdc00 fs/ext4/super.c:4754
mount_bdev+0x2e9/0x3b0 fs/super.c:1158
mount_fs+0x4b/0x1e4 fs/super.c:1261
[...]
==================================================================
Above issue may happen as follows:
-------------------------------------
ext4_fill_super
ext4_enable_quotas
ext4_quota_enable
ext4_iget
__ext4_iget
ext4_ext_check_inode
ext4_ext_check
__ext4_ext_check
ext4_valid_extent_entries
Check for overlapping extents does't take effect
dquot_enable
vfs_load_quota_inode
v2_check_quota_file
v2_read_header
ext4_quota_read
ext4_bread
ext4_getblk
ext4_map_blocks
ext4_ext_map_blocks
ext4_find_extent
ext4_cache_extents
ext4_es_cache_extent
ext4_es_cache_extent
__es_tree_search
ext4_es_end
BUG_ON(es->es_lblk + es->es_len < es->es_lblk)
The error ext4 extents is as follows:
0af3 0300 0400 0000 00000000 extent_header
00000000 0100 0000 12000000 extent1
00000000 0100 0000 18000000 extent2
02000000 0400 0000 14000000 extent3
In the ext4_valid_extent_entries function,
if prev is 0, no error is returned even if lblock<=prev.
This was intended to skip the check on the first extent, but
in the error image above, prev=0+1-1=0 when checking the second extent,
so even though lblock<=prev, the function does not return an error.
As a result, bug_ON occurs in __es_tree_search and the system panics.
To solve this problem, we only need to check that:
1. The lblock of the first extent is not less than 0.
2. The lblock of the next extent is not less than
the next block of the previous extent.
The same applies to extent_idx.
Fixes: 5946d089379a ("ext4: check for overlapping extents in ext4_valid_extent_entries()")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/extents.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index e473fde6b64b..86ba0db20968 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static int ext4_valid_extent_entries(struct inode *inode,
{
unsigned short entries;
ext4_lblk_t lblock = 0;
- ext4_lblk_t prev = 0;
+ ext4_lblk_t cur = 0;
if (eh->eh_entries == 0)
return 1;
@@ -396,11 +396,11 @@ static int ext4_valid_extent_entries(struct inode *inode,
/* Check for overlapping extents */
lblock = le32_to_cpu(ext->ee_block);
- if ((lblock <= prev) && prev) {
+ if (lblock < cur) {
*pblk = ext4_ext_pblock(ext);
return 0;
}
- prev = lblock + ext4_ext_get_actual_len(ext) - 1;
+ cur = lblock + ext4_ext_get_actual_len(ext);
ext++;
entries--;
}
@@ -420,13 +420,13 @@ static int ext4_valid_extent_entries(struct inode *inode,
/* Check for overlapping index extents */
lblock = le32_to_cpu(ext_idx->ei_block);
- if ((lblock <= prev) && prev) {
+ if (lblock < cur) {
*pblk = ext4_idx_pblock(ext_idx);
return 0;
}
ext_idx++;
entries--;
- prev = lblock;
+ cur = lblock + 1;
}
}
return 1;
--
2.31.1
