[PATCH 2/3] ext4: force overhead calculation if the s_overhead_cluster makes no sense

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If the file system does not use bigalloc, calculating the overhead is
cheap, so force the recalculation of the overhead so we don't have to
trust the precalculated overhead in the superblock.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx
---
 fs/ext4/super.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 23a9b2c086ed..d08820fdfdee 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -5289,9 +5289,18 @@ static int __ext4_fill_super(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
 	 * Get the # of file system overhead blocks from the
 	 * superblock if present.
 	 */
-	if (es->s_overhead_clusters)
-		sbi->s_overhead = le32_to_cpu(es->s_overhead_clusters);
-	else {
+	sbi->s_overhead = le32_to_cpu(es->s_overhead_clusters);
+	/* ignore the precalculated value if it is ridiculous */
+	if (sbi->s_overhead > ext4_blocks_count(es))
+		sbi->s_overhead = 0;
+	/*
+	 * If the bigalloc feature is not enabled recalculating the
+	 * overhead doesn't take long, so we might as well just redo
+	 * it to make sure we are using the correct value.
+	 */
+	if (!ext4_has_feature_bigalloc(sb))
+		sbi->s_overhead = 0;
+	if (sbi->s_overhead == 0) {
 		err = ext4_calculate_overhead(sb);
 		if (err)
 			goto failed_mount_wq;
-- 
2.31.0




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux