[PATCH 10/11] block/bfq-iosched.c: use "false" rather than "BLK_RW_ASYNC"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



bfq_get_queue() expects a "bool" for the third arg, so pass "false"
rather than "BLK_RW_ASYNC" which will soon be removed.

Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
---
 block/bfq-iosched.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index 36a66e97e3c2..ed9bb1054bf2 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -5448,7 +5448,7 @@ static void bfq_check_ioprio_change(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, struct bio *bio)
 	bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, false);
 	if (bfqq) {
 		bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, bfqq);
-		bfqq = bfq_get_queue(bfqd, bio, BLK_RW_ASYNC, bic, true);
+		bfqq = bfq_get_queue(bfqd, bio, false, bic, true);
 		bic_set_bfqq(bic, bfqq, false);
 	}
 





[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux