Re: [RFC 3/6] ext4: Use in_range() for range checking in ext4_fc_replay_check_excluded

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon 31-01-22 20:46:52, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> Instead of open coding it, use in_range() function instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/ext4/fast_commit.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c b/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
> index 5934c23e153e..bd6a47d18716 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
> @@ -1874,8 +1874,8 @@ bool ext4_fc_replay_check_excluded(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t blk)
>  		if (state->fc_regions[i].ino == 0 ||
>  			state->fc_regions[i].len == 0)
>  			continue;
> -		if (blk >= state->fc_regions[i].pblk &&
> -		    blk < state->fc_regions[i].pblk + state->fc_regions[i].len)
> +		if (in_range(blk, state->fc_regions[i].pblk,
> +					state->fc_regions[i].len))
>  			return true;
>  	}
>  	return false;
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR



[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux