Re: [PATCH resend] fs/ext4: use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: riteshh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] fs/ext4: use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG
From: cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 06:22:46 +0000
Cc: adilger.kernel@xxxxxxxxx, cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx, lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tytso@xxxxxxx, xu.xin16@xxxxxxxxxx, zealci@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20220105053522.ql7hg3luxn6gsp7m@riteshh-domain>
References: <20220105053522.ql7hg3luxn6gsp7m@riteshh-domain>

>While we are at it, I feel correcting below BUG() in the same patch(es?)
>might be useful too.

I agree with it.

Feel free if you're willing to do the integration of patches.

References:
- Re: [PATCH resend] fs/ext4: use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG
  - From: riteshh

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH resend] fs/ext4: use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG
Next by Date: [PATCH] ext4: Simplify !page_bufs logic with simple BUG_ON()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH resend] fs/ext4: use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG
Next by thread: [PATCH] ext4: Simplify !page_bufs logic with simple BUG_ON()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Reiser Filesystem Development] [Ceph FS] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Yosemite National Park] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux