Re: [PATCH] test-appliance: add ext4/050 to encrypt.exclude

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:08:14PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> The ext4/050 test can't handle encrypted directories, so skip it for
> now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/cfg/encrypt.exclude    | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kvm-xfstests/test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/cfg/encrypt.exclude b/kvm-xfstests/test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/cfg/encrypt.exclude
> index f3c7a959..21a8b45f 100644
> --- a/kvm-xfstests/test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/cfg/encrypt.exclude
> +++ b/kvm-xfstests/test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/cfg/encrypt.exclude
> @@ -12,6 +12,11 @@ ext4/028
>  # file systems with encryption enabled can't be mounted with ext3
>  ext4/044
>  
> +# This test to make sure ext4 directory entries are appropriately
> +# wiped after a file is deleted, or after htree operations is
> +# incompatible with an encrypted directory.
> +ext4/048

The commit message says ext4/050, but the test added to the list is ext4/048.
Is ext4/048 the one intended?

- Eric



[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux