On Tue 26-10-21 12:12:38, Amir Goldstein wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 10:27 PM Gabriel Krisman Bertazi > <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > This is the 9th version of this patch series. Thank you, Amir, Jan and > > Ted, for the feedback in the previous versions. > > > > The main difference in this version is that the pool is no longer > > resizeable nor limited in number of marks, even though we only > > pre-allocate 32 slots. In addition, ext4 was modified to always return > > non-zero errno, and the documentation was fixed accordingly (No longer > > suggests we return EXT4_ERR* values. > > > > I also droped the Reviewed-by tags from the ext4 patch, due to the > > changes above. > > > > Please let me know what you think. > > > > All good on my end. > I've made a couple of minor comments that > could be addressed on commit if no other issues are found. All good on my end as well. I've applied all the minor updates, tested the result and pushed it out to fsnotify branch of my tree. WRT to your new FS_ERROR LTP tests, I've noticed that the testcases 1 and 3 from test fanotify20 fail for me. After a bit of debugging this seems to be a bug in ext4 where it calls ext4_abort() with EXT4_ERR_ESHUTDOWN instead of plain ESHUTDOWN. Not sure if you have that fixed or how come the tests passed for you. After fixing that ext4 bug everything passes for me. Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR
