From: Wang Jianchao <wangjianchao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Get rid of the 'group' parameter of ext4_trim_extent as we can get
it from the 'e4b'.
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Wang Jianchao <wangjianchao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 089c958aa2c3..09fb0223afaa 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -6183,7 +6183,6 @@ int ext4_group_add_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct super_block *sb,
* @sb: super block for the file system
* @start: starting block of the free extent in the alloc. group
* @count: number of blocks to TRIM
- * @group: alloc. group we are working with
* @e4b: ext4 buddy for the group
*
* Trim "count" blocks starting at "start" in the "group". To assure that no
@@ -6191,11 +6190,12 @@ int ext4_group_add_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct super_block *sb,
* be called with under the group lock.
*/
static int ext4_trim_extent(struct super_block *sb, int start, int count,
- ext4_group_t group, struct ext4_buddy *e4b)
+ struct ext4_buddy *e4b)
__releases(bitlock)
__acquires(bitlock)
{
struct ext4_free_extent ex;
+ ext4_group_t group = e4b->bd_group;
int ret = 0;
trace_ext4_trim_extent(sb, group, start, count);
@@ -6271,8 +6271,7 @@ ext4_trim_all_free(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t group,
next = mb_find_next_bit(bitmap, max + 1, start);
if ((next - start) >= minblocks) {
- ret = ext4_trim_extent(sb, start,
- next - start, group, &e4b);
+ ret = ext4_trim_extent(sb, start, next - start, &e4b);
if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
break;
ret = 0;
--
2.17.1
