Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hey Gabriel, > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 12:21:19PM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> > No problem. That's what review is for ;-) >> >> > BTW, unless anyone is specifically interested I don't think there >> > is a reason to re post the test patches before the submission request. >> > Certainly not for the small fixes that I requested. >> >> > I do request that you post a link to a branch with the fixed test >> > so that we can experiment with the kernel patches. >> >> > I've also CC'ed Matthew who may want to help with review of the test >> > and man page that you posted in the cover letter [1]. >> >> @Amir Thanks a lot for your review, agree with all you mentioned. >> >> @Gabriel Thanks for your contribution. I'd also consider squashing some of the >> commits. > > Is the FAN_FS_ERROR feature to be included within the 5.15 release? If so, > I may need to do some shuffling around as these LTP tests collide with the > ones I author for the FAN_REPORT_PIDFD series. > Matthew, Hi, sorry for the delay. I took a short vacation and couldn't follow up. I think it is too late for 5.15, please go ahead with FAN_REPORT_PIDFD series and I will consider them in my future submission. Thank you, -- Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
