On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 12:19:15PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > diff --git a/fs/ext4/orphan.c b/fs/ext4/orphan.c > index 019719c0ac12..18622ddeb41b 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/orphan.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/orphan.c > @@ -28,28 +43,40 @@ static int ext4_orphan_file_add(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode) > */ > return -ENOSPC; > } > - oi->of_binfo[i].ob_free_entries--; > - spin_unlock(&oi->of_lock); > > - /* > - * Get access to orphan block. We have dropped of_lock but since we > - * have decremented number of free entries we are guaranteed free entry > - * in our block. > - */ > ret = ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle, inode->i_sb, > oi->of_binfo[i].ob_bh, EXT4_JTR_ORPHAN_FILE); > if (ret) > return ret; Shouldn't there be a call to: atomic_inc(&oi->of_binfo[i].ob_free_entries); before we return, so the free_entry count stays consistent? Otherwise, with the test-bot comments also addressed, you can add: Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> Thanks, - Ted