On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 11:54:45AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote: > Yes, thanks for catching it. I think if make below change, i.e. scale cluster > size, we should be good. Since this will make blocks_per_group = 4096 and > clusters_per_group = 256. This is the condition, which I guess the original > kernel patch fixed it for. So, we need not increase the filesystem size. > > $MKFS_EXT4_PROG -F -b $BLOCK_SIZE -O bigalloc -C $((BLOCK_SIZE * 16)) -g 256 $SCRATCH_DEV 512m \ > Agreed, it looks like that should work. Cheers, - Ted
