On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 07:17:50PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Sorry to have missed the third case here, and no problems with the
> revert. I'm hoping that the second patch can be kept as-is, assuming
> there's no support for resizing sparse_super2 by any code path?
No worries, I missed it too in my review. Yes, I only reverted the
first patch, and kept the second one. There was a minor conflict in
the revert, but it was easily fixed up.
- Ted
