[RFC PATCH] ext4: remove conflict comment from __ext4_forget

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Guoqing Jiang <jiangguoqing@xxxxxxxxxx>

We do a bforget and return for no journal case, so let's remove this
conflict comment.

Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <jiangguoqing@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Not sure if my understanding is correct, so this is RFC.

Thanks,
Guoqing

 fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c
index be799040a415..6e224b19eae7 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c
@@ -244,9 +244,6 @@ int __ext4_journal_get_write_access(const char *where, unsigned int line,
  * "bh" may be NULL: a metadata block may have been freed from memory
  * but there may still be a record of it in the journal, and that record
  * still needs to be revoked.
- *
- * If the handle isn't valid we're not journaling, but we still need to
- * call into ext4_journal_revoke() to put the buffer head.
  */
 int __ext4_forget(const char *where, unsigned int line, handle_t *handle,
 		  int is_metadata, struct inode *inode,
-- 
2.25.1




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux