We should use unsigned long long rather than loff_t to avoid
overflow in ext4_max_bitmap_size() for comparison before returning.
w/o this patch sbi->s_bitmap_maxbytes was becoming a negative
value due to overflow of upper_limit (with has_huge_files as true)
Below is a quick test to trigger it on a 64KB pagesize system.
sudo mkfs.ext4 -b 65536 -O ^has_extents,^64bit /dev/loop2
sudo mount /dev/loop2 /mnt
sudo echo "hello" > /mnt/hello -> This will error out with
"echo: write error: File too large"
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/super.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 7dc94f3e18e6..bedb66386966 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -3189,17 +3189,17 @@ static loff_t ext4_max_size(int blkbits, int has_huge_files)
*/
static loff_t ext4_max_bitmap_size(int bits, int has_huge_files)
{
- loff_t res = EXT4_NDIR_BLOCKS;
+ unsigned long long upper_limit, res = EXT4_NDIR_BLOCKS;
int meta_blocks;
- loff_t upper_limit;
- /* This is calculated to be the largest file size for a dense, block
+
+ /*
+ * This is calculated to be the largest file size for a dense, block
* mapped file such that the file's total number of 512-byte sectors,
* including data and all indirect blocks, does not exceed (2^48 - 1).
*
* __u32 i_blocks_lo and _u16 i_blocks_high represent the total
* number of 512-byte sectors of the file.
*/
-
if (!has_huge_files) {
/*
* !has_huge_files or implies that the inode i_block field
@@ -3242,7 +3242,7 @@ static loff_t ext4_max_bitmap_size(int bits, int has_huge_files)
if (res > MAX_LFS_FILESIZE)
res = MAX_LFS_FILESIZE;
- return res;
+ return (loff_t)res;
}
static ext4_fsblk_t descriptor_loc(struct super_block *sb,
--
2.31.1
