Hello Ted,
Thank you for your advice, I will pay attention to it in the future.
Do I need to resend the series of patches
or continue to send the remaining patches this time?
Thanks,
Wu Guanghao
On Mon, 31 May 2021 00:28:46 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 09:23:49AM +0800, Wu Guanghao wrote:
>> V1 -> V2:
>>
>> [PATCH V2 03/12] zap_sector: fix memory leak
>> free and return operators placed in {} block
>>
>> [PATCH V2 04/12] ss_add_info_dir: fix memory leak and check whether,NULL pointer
>> modified "=" to "=="
>>
>> [PATCH V2 06/12] append_pathname: check the value returned by realloc to avoid segfault
>> [PATCH V2 07/12] argv_parse: check return value of malloc in argv_parse()
>> Fix typos
>>
>> [PATCH V2 10/12] hashmap: change return value type of, ext2fs_hashmap_add()
>> remove "new_block = NULL;"
>
> Did you only send the patches that you changed, and didn't resend the
> patches that didn't change between V1 and V2?
>
> It's actually better if you resend the whole series in the future.
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Ted
> .
> .
