friendly ping ... On 2021/4/24 12:46, Zhiqiang Liu wrote: > > On 2021/4/23 23:46, Theodore Ts'o wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 10:18:09AM +0800, Zhiqiang Liu wrote: >>> Thanks for your reply. >>> Actually, we have met the problem in ipsan situation. >>> When exec 'fsck -a <remote-device>', short-term fluctuations or >>> abnormalities may occur on the network. Despite the driver has >>> do the best effort, some IO errors may occur. So add retrying in >>> e2fsprogs can further improve the reliability of the repair >>> process. >> But why doesn't this happen when the file system is mounted, and why >> is that acceptable? And why not change the driver to do more retries? >> >> - Ted >> > Actually, this may happen when the filesystem is mounted. The difference > is that the mounted filesystem can ensure the consistency with journal. > > For example, if the IO error occurs when calling io_channel_write_byte() > to update superblock, the checksum may be not written to the disk successfully. > Then the checksum error will occur, and the filesystem cannot be > repaired with 'fsck -y|a|f'. > > This situation has a very low probability. For improving the reliability of > the repair process, the retries in e2fsprogs may be necessary. > > Regards > Zhiqiang Liu. > >> . >> > > .