On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:51:55AM +0100, Alexander Lochmann wrote: > Some members of transaction_t are allowed to be read without > any lock being held if consistency doesn't matter. > Based on LockDoc's findings, we extended the locking > documentation of those members. > Each one of them is marked with a short comment: > "no lock for quick racy checks". > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Lochmann <alexander.lochmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Horst Schirmeier <horst.schirmeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Thanks, applied. I had to fix up the patch, which was mailer-damaged, and I also reflowed the comments. - Ted
