Hi Gabriel,
Le 10/12/2020 à 21:51, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi a écrit :
> Arnaud Ferraris <arnaud.ferraris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> @@ -1483,11 +1520,7 @@ skip_checksum:
>> if (check_filetype(ctx, dirent, ino, &cd->pctx))
>> dir_modified++;
>>
>> - if (dir_encpolicy_id == NO_ENCRYPTION_POLICY) {
>> - /* Unencrypted directory */
>> - if (check_name(ctx, dirent, &cd->pctx))
>> - dir_modified++;
>> - } else {
>> + if (dir_encpolicy_id != NO_ENCRYPTION_POLICY) {
>> /* Encrypted directory */
>> if (dot_state > 1 &&
>> check_encrypted_dirent(ctx, dirent,
>> @@ -1497,6 +1530,14 @@ skip_checksum:
>> dir_modified++;
>> goto next;
>> }
>> + } else if (cf_dir) {
>> + /* Casefolded directory */
>> + if (encoded_check_name(ctx, dirent, &cd->pctx))
>> + dir_modified++;
>> + } else {
>> + /* Unencrypted and uncasefolded directory */
>> + if (check_name(ctx, dirent, &cd->pctx))
>> + dir_modified++;
>> }
>
> This won't do for encrypted+casefolded directories, right?
Indeed, as encrypted+casefolded isn't supported right now, it's just a
re-arrangement to ease future support, as suggested by Eric.
Arnaud
>
>>
>> if (dx_db) {
>
