Re: [PATCH] ext4: avoid s_mb_prefetch to be zero in individual scenarios

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Nov 30, 2020, at 8:49 PM, Chunguang Xu <brookxu.cn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> From: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> patch cfd7323 introduces block bitmap prefetch, and expects to read
> block bitmaps of flex_bg through an IO. However, it seems to ignore
> the value range of s_log_groups_per_flex. In the scenario where the
> value of s_log_groups_per_flex is greater than 27, s_mb_prefetch or
> s_mb_prefetch_limit will overflow, cause a divide zero exception.
> 
> In addition, the logic of calculating nr maybe also flawed, because
> the size of flexbg is fixed during a single mount, but s_mb_prefetch
> can be modified, which causes nr to fail to meet the value condition
> of [1, flexbg_size].
> 
> PID: 3873   TASK: ffff88800f11d880  CPU: 2   COMMAND: "executor"
> #0 [ffff8880114a6ec0] __show_regs.cold.7 at ffffffff83cf29e2
> #1 [ffff8880114a6f40] do_trap at ffffffff81065c61
> #2 [ffff8880114a6f98] do_error_trap at ffffffff81065d65
> #3 [ffff8880114a6fe0] exc_divide_error at ffffffff83dd2fd4
> #4 [ffff8880114a7000] asm_exc_divide_error at ffffffff83e00872
>    [exception RIP: ext4_mb_regular_allocator+3885]
>    RIP: ffffffff8191258d  RSP: ffff8880114a70b8  RFLAGS: 00010246
>    RAX: 0000000000000000  RBX: 0000000000000000  RCX: ffffffff8191257a
>    RDX: 0000000000000000  RSI: 0000000000000000  RDI: 0000000000000005
>    RBP: 0000000000000200   R8: ffff88800f11d880   R9: ffffed1001e23b11
>    R10: ffff88800f11d887  R11: ffffed1001e23b10  R12: ffff888010147000
>    R13: 0000000000000000  R14: 0000000000000002  R15: dffffc0000000000
>    ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff  CS: 0010  SS: 0018
> #5 [ffff8880114a7260] ext4_mb_new_blocks at ffffffff8191b6ba
> #6 [ffff8880114a7420] ext4_new_meta_blocks at ffffffff81870d6f
> #7 [ffff8880114a74e8] ext4_xattr_block_set at ffffffff819ced37
> #8 [ffff8880114a7758] ext4_xattr_set_handle at ffffffff819d4776
> #9 [ffff8880114a7928] ext4_xattr_set at ffffffff819d501b
>    RIP: 000000000045eb29  RSP: 00007ff74e97bc38  RFLAGS: 00000246
>    RAX: ffffffffffffffda  RBX: 000000000055bf00  RCX: 000000000045eb29
>    RDX: 00000000200000c0  RSI: 0000000020000080  RDI: 0000000020000040
>    RBP: 00000000004b068e   R8: 0000000000000001   R9: 0000000000000000
>    R10: 0000000000000002  R11: 0000000000000246  R12: 000000000055bf00
>    R13: 00007fff50fc111f  R14: 00007ff74e97bdc0  R15: 0000000000022000
>    ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000bc  CS: 0033  SS: 002b
> 
> The maximum size of a single IO will be limited by multiple factors,
> such as max_hw_sectors, max_dev_sectors, BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS. The
> max_hw_sectors, max_dev_sectors are determined by the device, and
> BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS is a constant. In most scenarios, users will not
> modify max_sectors. Therefore, we can safely assume that the maximum
> size of a single IO is BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS. So far, we have determined
> the number of blocks that a single IO can hold. Usually the file
> system block is a multiple of the disk block, but we will ignore this
> for now. According to the current value of BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS and

BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS is 2560, or 1280KB, which isn't really a good
limit for the IO size.  I think BLK_MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE = 65536 = 32MB
is a better upper limit to use in this case.  This will almost always
be limited by he actual flexbg size, but provides a reasonable upper
limit that will still be useful into the future.

> comprehensive considerations, the maximum number of bitmap blocks that
> can be loaded by a single IO can be safely limited to 2^12. This maybe
> a good choice to solve divide zero problem and avoiding performance
> degradation.
> 
> Reported-by: Tosk Robot <tencent_os_robot@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Samuel Liao <samuelliao@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 12 +++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index 24af9ed..06af4ca 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -2395,9 +2395,10 @@ void ext4_mb_prefetch_fini(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t group,
> 
> 				nr = sbi->s_mb_prefetch;
> 				if (ext4_has_feature_flex_bg(sb)) {
> -					nr = (group / sbi->s_mb_prefetch) *
> -						sbi->s_mb_prefetch;
> -					nr = nr + sbi->s_mb_prefetch - group;
> +					nr = 1 << sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex;
> +					if (group & (nr - 1))
> +						nr -= group & (nr - 1);
> +					nr = min(nr, sbi->s_mb_prefetch);
> 				}
> 				prefetch_grp = ext4_mb_prefetch(sb, group,
> 							nr, &prefetch_ios);
> @@ -2700,7 +2701,7 @@ static int ext4_mb_init_backend(struct super_block *sb)
> 	ext4_group_t ngroups = ext4_get_groups_count(sb);
> 	ext4_group_t i;
> 	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
> -	int err;
> +	int err, log;

(style) this variable should be declared inside the block below.

> 	struct ext4_group_desc *desc;
> 	struct ext4_group_info ***group_info;
> 	struct kmem_cache *cachep;
> @@ -2733,7 +2734,8 @@ static int ext4_mb_init_backend(struct super_block *sb)
> 
> 	if (ext4_has_feature_flex_bg(sb)) {
> 		/* a single flex group is supposed to be read by a single IO */
> -		sbi->s_mb_prefetch = 1 << sbi->s_es->s_log_groups_per_flex;
> +		log = min_t(unsigned char, 12, sbi->s_es->s_log_groups_per_flex);
> +		sbi->s_mb_prefetch = 1 << log;

Rather than hard-code "12" here, it would be better to use BLK_MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE
directly, so that it is clear in the future where this value came from, like:

	if (ext4_has_feature_flex_bg(sb)) {
+		unsigned int len;
+
		/* a single flex group is supposed to be read by a single IO */
-		sbi->s_mb_prefetch = 1 << sbi->s_es->s_log_groups_per_flex;
+		len = min(BLK_MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE >> (sb->s_blocksize_bits - 9),
+			  1 << sbi->s_es->s_log_groups_per_flex);
+		sbi->s_mb_prefetch = len;

Note the need for "min_t()" can be avoided by using "1" or "1U" as needed in
the second half of "min()" to match the type of BLK_MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE.

Cheers, Andreas





Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux