Re: [PATCH 03/12] ext4: Standardize error message in ext4_protect_reserved_inode()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Nov 27, 2020, at 4:33 AM, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> We use __ext4_error() when ext4_protect_reserved_inode() finds
> filesystem corruption. However EXT4_ERROR_INODE_ERR() is perfectly
> capable of reporting all the needed information. So just use that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>

I'm not a big fan of EXT4_ERROR_INODE_ERR() vs. ext4_error_inode_err() and
some of the error macros being upper-case vs. lower case, but that is not
the fault of this patch... :-)

Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> fs/ext4/block_validity.c | 10 ++++------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
> index 8e6ca23ed172..13ffda871227 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
> @@ -176,12 +176,10 @@ static int ext4_protect_reserved_inode(struct super_block *sb,
> 			err = add_system_zone(system_blks, map.m_pblk, n, ino);
> 			if (err < 0) {
> 				if (err == -EFSCORRUPTED) {
> -					__ext4_error(sb, __func__, __LINE__,
> -						     -err, map.m_pblk,
> -						     "blocks %llu-%llu from inode %u overlap system zone",
> -						     map.m_pblk,
> -						     map.m_pblk + map.m_len - 1,
> -						     ino);
> +					EXT4_ERROR_INODE_ERR(inode, -err,
> +						"blocks %llu-%llu from inode overlap system zone",
> +						map.m_pblk,
> +						map.m_pblk + map.m_len - 1);
> 				}
> 				break;
> 			}
> --
> 2.16.4
> 


Cheers, Andreas





Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux