On 07/11/20 12:15 am, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 at 19:28, Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Implementation of support for parameterized testing in KUnit.
>> This approach requires the creation of a test case using the
>> KUNIT_CASE_PARAM macro that accepts a generator function as input.
>> This generator function should return the next parameter given the
>> previous parameter in parameterized tests. It also provides
>> a macro to generate common-case generators.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Co-developed-by: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
> [...]
>> - kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case)
>> - kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case);
>> + kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) {
>> + struct kunit test = { .param_value = NULL, .param_index = 0 };
>> + bool test_success = true;
>> +
>> + if (test_case->generate_params)
>> + test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(NULL);
>> +
>> + do {
>> + kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test);
>> + test_success &= test_case->success;
>> +
>> + if (test_case->generate_params) {
>> + kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test,
>> + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
>> + "# %s: param-%d %s",
>> + test_case->name, test.param_index,
>> + kunit_status_to_string(test.success));
>
> Sorry, I still found something. The patch I sent had this aligned with
> the '(', whereas when I apply this patch it no longer is aligned. Why?
>
> I see the rest of the file also aligns arguments with opening '(', so
> I think your change is inconsistent.
>
Ah those lines had spaces instead of tab and I think I messed up the alignment
fixing that. I will send another version fixing this.
Thanks!
> Thanks,
> -- Marco
>
