From: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@xxxxxxxxxxx> Since ext4_data_block_valid() has been renamed to ext4_inode_block_valid(), the related comments need to be updated. Signed-off-by: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/ext4/block_validity.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c index 5e98ca0..03b237f 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c +++ b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ static void ext4_destroy_system_zone(struct rcu_head *rcu) * * The update of system_blks pointer in this function is protected by * sb->s_umount semaphore. However we have to be careful as we can be - * racing with ext4_data_block_valid() calls reading system_blks rbtree + * racing with ext4_inode_block_valid() calls reading system_blks rbtree * protected only by RCU. That's why we first build the rbtree and then * swap it in place. */ @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ int ext4_setup_system_zone(struct super_block *sb) /* * System blks rbtree complete, announce it once to prevent racing - * with ext4_data_block_valid() accessing the rbtree at the same + * with ext4_inode_block_valid() accessing the rbtree at the same * time. */ rcu_assign_pointer(sbi->system_blks, system_blks); @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ int ext4_setup_system_zone(struct super_block *sb) * * The update of system_blks pointer in this function is protected by * sb->s_umount semaphore. However we have to be careful as we can be - * racing with ext4_data_block_valid() calls reading system_blks rbtree + * racing with ext4_inode_block_valid() calls reading system_blks rbtree * protected only by RCU. So we first clear the system_blks pointer and * then free the rbtree only after RCU grace period expires. */ -- 1.8.3.1
