Re: [PATCH] mballoc: Replace seq_printf with seq_puts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Xu Wang <vulab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mballoc: Replace seq_printf with seq_puts
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 14:22:10 -0400
Cc: adilger.kernel@xxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20200810022158.9167-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
References: <20200810022158.9167-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn>

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 02:21:58AM +0000, Xu Wang wrote:
> seq_puts is a lot cheaper than seq_printf, so use that to print
> literal strings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xu Wang <vulab@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Applied, thanks.

					- Ted

References:
- [PATCH] mballoc: Replace seq_printf with seq_puts
  - From: Xu Wang

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ext4: optimize the implementation of ext4_mb_good_group()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ext4: remove unused parameter of ext4_generic_delete_entry function
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] mballoc: Replace seq_printf with seq_puts
Next by thread: [PATCH] ext4: remove unused parameter of ext4_generic_delete_entry function
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Reiser Filesystem Development] [Ceph FS] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Yosemite National Park] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux