Re: [PATCH 5/5] f2fs: support direct I/O with fscrypt using blk-crypto

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 09:05:23AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2020/7/10 3:47, Satya Tangirala wrote:
> > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Wire up f2fs with fscrypt direct I/O support.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > index b35a50f4953c..6d662a37b445 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > @@ -4082,7 +4082,9 @@ static inline bool f2fs_force_buffered_io(struct inode *inode,
> >  	struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
> >  	int rw = iov_iter_rw(iter);
> >  
> > -	if (f2fs_post_read_required(inode))
> > +	if (!fscrypt_dio_supported(iocb, iter))
> > +		return true;
> > +	if (fsverity_active(inode))
> 
> static inline bool f2fs_post_read_required(struct inode *inode)
> {
> 	return f2fs_encrypted_file(inode) || fsverity_active(inode) ||
> 		f2fs_compressed_file(inode);
> }
> 
> That's not correct, missed to check compression condition.
> 

Thanks Chao, great catch.  This used to be correct, but we missed that the
second f2fs_compressed_file() check got removed by commit b5f4684b5f5f
("f2fs: remove redundant compress inode check").

- Eric



[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux