From: Wang Shilong <wshilong@xxxxxxx> This should not be kept, the reaons is similar to what e2fsck_pass1 has done before. Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wshilong@xxxxxxx> --- e2fsck/pass1.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/e2fsck/pass1.c b/e2fsck/pass1.c index b4adb8fa..3d6af9fb 100644 --- a/e2fsck/pass1.c +++ b/e2fsck/pass1.c @@ -3012,6 +3012,12 @@ static errcode_t e2fsck_pass1_merge_context(e2fsck_t global_ctx, global_ctx->flags |= thread_ctx->flags; /* threads might enable E2F_OPT_YES */ global_ctx->options |= thread_ctx->options; + /* + * The l+f inode may have been cleared, so zap it now and + * later passes will recalculate it if necessary + */ + global_ctx->lost_and_found = 0; + e2fsck_pass1_merge_dir_info(global_ctx, thread_ctx); e2fsck_pass1_merge_dx_dir(global_ctx, thread_ctx); retval = e2fsck_pass1_merge_fs(global_ctx->fs, thread_ctx->fs); -- 2.25.4