On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 10:07:06AM +0000, Alex Zhuravlev wrote: > --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > @@ -2127,6 +2127,96 @@ static int ext4_mb_good_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, > return 0; > } > > +/* > + * each allocation context (i.e. a thread doing allocation) has own > + * sliding prefetch window of @s_mb_prefetch size which starts at the > + * very first goal and moves ahead of scaning. > + * a side effect is that subsequent allocations will likely find > + * the bitmaps in cache or at least in-flight. > + */ > +static void > +ext4_mb_prefetch(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, > + ext4_group_t start) > +{ > + struct super_block *sb = ac->ac_sb; > + ext4_group_t ngroups = ext4_get_groups_count(sb); > + struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb); > + struct ext4_group_info *grp; > + ext4_group_t nr, group = start; > + struct buffer_head *bh; > + > + /* limit prefetching at cr=0, otherwise mballoc can > + * spend a lot of time loading imperfect groups */ > + if (ac->ac_criteria < 2 && ac->ac_prefetch_ios >= sbi->s_mb_prefetch_limit) > + return; > + > + /* batch prefetching to get few READs in flight */ > + nr = ac->ac_prefetch - group; > + if (ac->ac_prefetch < group) > + /* wrapped to the first groups */ > + nr += ngroups; > + if (nr > 0)I > + return; > + BUG_ON(nr < 0); What are you trying to do here? If nr > 0, we return; if nr < 0, we BUG() --- but nr is an unsigned int, so we never can trigger --- which was the warning reported by the kbuild test bot. So we will only get past this point if ac_prefetch == group. But ac_prefetch appears to be the last group that we prefetched, so it's not clear that the logic is correct here. - Ted