On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 01:37:59AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 01:58:38PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> > Christoph, Dave --- does this give you the notification that you were
> > looking such that XFS could get the notification desired that it was
> > the timestamps need to be written back?
>
> I need to look at it in more detail as it seems convoluted. Also the
> order seems like you regress XFS in patch 1 and then fix it in patch 2?
In patch one we send I_DIRTY_SYNC as we had been doing as before. So
I don't believe that patch #1 would regress XFS; can you confirm?
My thinking was to move ahead with patch 1 so that it fixed the bug
which Eric Biffers had reported for f2fs, but only to move forward
with patch #2 if it would be useful for XFS.
Cheers,
- Ted
